PDF
version (printer friendly)
E-mail
this article
Esther
and the delivering power of God
There
are many places in the Bible that refer to the delivering power of God.
One of these places is also the book of Esther. I would like therefore
to take some time today to have a look at this book and the lesson that
it offers.
1. Esther 1,2:
The background
The events that are
described in the book of Esther happened when the people of Israel were
captive to Babylon. The place of the story is Shushan, the city where
the king of Persia and Media, the king Ahasuerus1,
used to live. This king after he put away his first wife, the queen Vashti2,
he was searching for a new wife to become the queen. To find a new wife
for the king, a competition was organised where women from all over the
kingdom came to Shushan with the purpose to be the ones that would
fulfil the empty place of the queen (Esther 2:1-4). Among those women
was also Esther, a Hebrew girl that was brought up by Mordecai, one of
the captives that had been carried away from Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar
(Esther 2:5-7). Finally, this girl after she obtained first the favour3
of "Hegai the custodian of the women" (Esther 2:9), second the
favour "of all who saw her" (Esther 2:15) and finally and most
importantly the favour of the king himself (Esther 2:17), gained the
competition. So Esther became the new queen. However, after she was
commanded accordingly by Mordecai, she didn't reveal to anyone that she
was a Jew. So no-one, not even the king, knew Esther's nationality.
2. Esther 3:
the problem starts
Though thus far
everything seems to be fine, Esther 3:1 introduces a new person whose
coming brought big problems. Esther 3:1-6 tells us about this person and
the problem that was caused:
Esther 3:1-2, 5-6
"After these things king Ahasuerus promoted Haman, the son of
Hammedatha THE AGAGITE, and advanced him and set his seat above all the
princes who were with him. And all the king's servant who were
within the king's gate bowed and paid homage to Haman, for so the king
had commanded concerning him. BUT MORDECAI WOULD NOT BOW OR PAY HOMAGE.
......... When Haman saw that Mordecai did not bow or pay homage, Haman
was filled with wrath. But he disdained to lay hands on Mordecai alone,
for they had told him of the people of Mordecai. INSTEAD, HAMAN SOUGHT
TO DESTROY ALL THE JEWS WHO WERE THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE KINGDOM OF
AHASUERES - the people of Mordecai"
Starting
from the end of the passage, it seems that we are in the beginning of a
really big problem. Haman, the man whom the king had advanced
"above all the princes that were with him" i.e. the man that
was essentially second in command, was angry with Mordecai, because the
latter didn't bow to him. For this reason he wanted to destroy the whole
nation of Mordecai i.e. all the Jews. Though it is evidently paranoiac
that Haman wanted to destroy a whole nation because one man didn't bow
to him, there are more spiritual insights into his actions than what a
first glance reveals. Really, since this great kingdom to which Haman
was second in command, extended from India to Ethiopia (Esther 1:1) we
can understand that no Jew would survive if Haman realised his
intentions. Now if this happened, then the question is of whom Christ
would be born? God had promised initially to Abraham (Genesis 17:7 and
Galatians 3:16) and later to David (Psalms 132:11-12 and Acts 2:30) that
of them he would raise up Christ. However, if Haman's intentions were
realised then no promise regarding Jesus Christ could be fulfilled and
the whole plan of God regarding salvation would fail. Haman's intentions
therefore were not simply paranoiac but absolutely devilish. It was the
Devil who was acting behind Haman, trying to cancel the coming of Christ
by destroying his whole nation, exactly as some centuries later he tried
through Herod to kill him before it was possible to accomplish his
mission. To summarise therefore, the first problem concerns the promises
of God regarding Jesus Christ. Here we have a man who has put in his
mind to frustrate those promises by killing all the Jews. The question
is: will God be able to defend His promises? Generally: are the promises
of God unbreakable or they can be broken in the will of the whatever
man, even if this man is second in command in the largest kingdom of his
time?
Though in the above we exposed the
problem, we haven't yet said anything about the cause of the problem.
Really, some of us may wonder why Mordecai didn't bow to Haman, showing
respect to him. At the end of the day, Haman was second in command, the
man next to the king. Why therefore Mordecai didn't pay homage to him as
the king had commanded (Esther 3:21)? Was he that proud? The answer is
negative. The reason that Mordecai didn't pay homage to Haman will be
understood if we pay attention to the fact that the text says that Haman
was an AGAGITE. This means that he came from Agag, a king
of the Amalekites4,
which in turn means that he himself was an
Amalekite5.
What's wrong with this? The wrong is that because the Amalekites fought
with Israel when the latter was in its way to the promised land (Exodus
17), they were pronounced by God as ENEMIES to Him. Exodus 17:14-16 very
plainly tells us:
Exodus 17:14-16
"Then the Lord said to Moses, "Write this for a
memorial in the book and recount it in the hearing of Joshua, that I
will utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven."
And Moses built an altar and call his name, "the Lord is my
banner" for he said, "Because a hand was lifted up against the
throne of the Lord, THE LORD WILL HAVE WAR WITH AMALEK FROM
GENERATION TO GENERATION"
Haman
therefore being an Amalekite, was one with whom God was in war. Thus
Mordecai had two choices: i) to honour Haman, the enemy of God, thus
dishonouring the Word of God or ii) to honour the Word of God and
deny to pay homage to Haman. Really no one can say that stands for God
when he is ready in the first occasion to compromise with the Word of
God. The only way to know God is through His Word and the only way to
stand for God is to stand on what His Word says. Mordecai made up his
mind not to compromise with the Word of God and pay homage, by bowing to
an enemy of God. In other words, he decided to stand for God, trusting
that God would deliver him as His Word promised6.
The second therefore question that seeks answer is: will God be able to
deliver Mordecai, a man that stood for Him? More generally: is God able
to deliver us out of any danger when we decide to trust in Him and to
stand boldly on His Word, or we are just exposed to men's desires and
"power"?
To answer the above questions, we
need to read the remaining of Esther.
3. Esther and
Mordecai
After Haman made up his
mind to destroy all the Jews, he needed to fix a date for it, and to
obtain the permission of the king. Esther 3 tells us that he fixed the
date on the thirteenth day of the twelfth month (Esther 3:13) and that,
after he pretended that the Jews didn't keep the king's laws [they had
God's law] and offered to the king a large amount of money [10,000
talants of silver] he finally obtained the approval of his plans (Esther
3:8-10). The command regarding the destruction of the Jews was written
under the guidance of Haman himself, and was sent out into all the
king's provinces causing great sorrow to all the Jews (Esther 3:12-15,
4:3). Mordocai himself was so sorrow that "he tore his clothes and
put on sackcloth and ashes, and went out into the midst of the
city" crying "with a loud and bitter cry" (Esther 4:1).
Esther, who still didn't know anything about the decree, was very sad
when she was told that Mordecai, her adopted father, was very sorrow,
and sent one of her servants to him to learn the reasons (Esther 4:4-6).
Through this servant, Mordecai made known to her what had happened,
asking her also to go to the king and plead him for her people (Esther
4:7-9). As we may remember Esther, being the queen, had no small
position in the kingdom. However, she was initially reluctant to do what
Mordecai asked her since it was not permitted to anyone to go to the
king uninvited (Esther 4:10-12).
One would expect that since Esther
the queen, was reluctant to help, there was not even the slightest
possibility for Mordecai and the remaining Jews to escape from Haman's
wrath. However, the things are not like these. FOR though Esther was
reluctant, the promises of God on which Mordecai stood, didn't depend on
Esther but on GOD. He was responsible to find a way out. Certainly
Esther was a very good possibility and that's why Mordecai asked her.
But the thing that Mordecai asked her to help does not mean that his
trust was in her and not in God. See his reply to Esther's reluctance:
Esther 4:13-14
"Do not think in your heart that you will escape in the king's
palace any more than all the other Jews. For IF YOU REMAIN COMPLETELY
SILENT AT THIS TIME, RELIEF AND DELIVERANCE WILL ARISE FOR THE JEWS FROM
ANOTHER PLACE, but you and your father's house will perish. Yet who
knows whether you have come to the kingdom for such a time as
this?"
Mordecai
trusted in God. The question in the latter part of his reply, shows that
he was aware that GOD brought Esther to the kingdom for this difficult
time. That's why he asked her to help. However, when he saw that she was
reluctant, he told her that even without her help, God was able to
deliver the Jews "from another place". It is really amazing
how much Mordecai trusted in God.
Following his lesson, we should also
trust in God and not in men. Jeremiah 17:5-8 makes known in advance what
will happen if we put our trust in men and what will happen if we put
our trust in God.
Jeremiah 17:5-8
"Thus says the Lord: "Cursed is the man who trusts in
man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart departs from the Lord. For
he shall be like a shrub in the desert, and shall not see when good
comes, but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in
a salt land which is not inhabited. Blessed
[i.e. happy] is the man that trusts in the Lord, and whose hope
is the Lord. For he shall be like a tree planted by the waters, which
spreads out its roots by the river, and will not fear when heat comes;
but its leaf will be green, and will not be anxious in the year of
draught, nor will cease from yielding fruit"
From
the one side we have the man that trusts in men and whose heart departs
from the Lord and from the other side we have the man that trusts in
God. The one is like a shrub in the desert and the other like a tree
planted by the waters. The one inhabits in a place that is not
inhabited, while the other by the river i.e. by a place full of life.
Returning now to Mordecai, his reply
changed Esther's mind, who now decided to help:
Esther 4:15-17
"Then Esther told them to reply to Mordecai: "Go,
gather all the Jews who are present in Shushan, and fast for me; neither
eat nor drink for three days, night or day. My maids and I will fast
likewise. AND SO I WILL GO TO THE KING, WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW;
AND IF I PERISH, I PERISH!" So Mordecai went his way and did
according to all that Esther commanded him."
On
the third of those days Esther finally went to the king. According to
Esther 4:11, she could have died having gone there uninvited, except if
the king held out to her his golden sceptre. Verse 2 tell us what
finally happened:
Esther 5:2
"so it was, when the king saw queen Esther standing in the court,
that SHE FOUND FAVOUR IN HIS SIGHT, and the king held out to Esther the
golden sceptre that was in his hand. Then Esther went near and touched
the top of the sceptre."
God
during the competition brought Esther into the favour of the king and
made her a queen (Esther 2:17), just for this difficult time ("for
such a time as this"). Now, when the time for Esther to play her
role arrived, God again brought her into the favour of the same man, and
she was not put to death having gone into his court uninvited. In this
visit to the king, Esther invited him and Haman to a banquet that she
would prepare for them that afternoon. When they went there, another
banquet was arranged for the next afternoon (Esther 5:3-8). As we will
see, the time from the one banquet to the other, was really very
critical.
4. The time
from the one banquet to the other
The invitation of the
queen to another banquet the next day made Haman very joyful (Esther
5:9) since it was really a great honour to be feasting with royalty.
However, his joyfulness turned to wrath when at the entrance to the
palace he saw Mordecai, "and that HE DID NOT STAND OR TREMBLE
BEFORE HIM" (Esther 5:9) As it is clear, despite the critical of
the situation, Mordecai was not willing to give up and pay homage to
Haman. He continued trusting in God and His Word. He continued to
believe that God would deliver him and his nation. However, Haman's
wrath drove him even further. When he returned to his home, apart from
his joy regarding the invitation of the queen, he also confessed to his
wife and friends his wrath for Mordecai. Then, his wife and friends made
a suggestion to him:
Esther 5:14
"Then his wife Zeresh and all his friends said to him, "Let a
gallows be made, fifty cubits high, and in the morning suggest to the
king that Mordecai be hanged on it; then go merrily with the king to the
banquet." And the thing pleased Haman; so he had the gallows
made"
As
it seems the situation became even worse for Mordecai. Haman was not
going to wait until the day that was defined for the destruction of the
Jews, to see him dead. He wanted this to happen much earlier and in fact
the next morning!! Evidently, if God was to bring deliverance to
Mordecai he had to do it that night. And that's what He did:
Esther 6:1-3
"That night THE KING COULD NOT SLEEP. So one was commanded to bring
the book of the records of the chronicles; and they were read before the
king. And it was found written that Mordecai had told of Bigthans and
Teresh, two of the king's eunuchs, the doorkeepers who had sought to lay
hands on king Ahasuerus. Then the king said, "What honour or
dignity has been bestowed on Mordecai for this?" And the king's
servants who attended him said, "Nothing has been done for
him."
Sometime
after Esther became a queen and before Haman's evolution to second in
command, Mordecai had protected the king against a conspiracy, planned
by two of his doorkeepers, Bigthans and Teresh (Esther 2:21-23). Though
this was written in the chronicles i.e. in the official diary, nothing
was done as a honour to Mordecai. However, this was not accidental since
it was through this not honoured act that God would bring deliverance to
him, exactly at the time that he needed it most. So, just in the night
that was supposed to be the last night of Mordecai, "the king could
not sleep". Though it is not said explicitly, the results will show
that this was divinely planned so that he can stay awake and do the
things that followed7.
The first of these things was to ask for the book of the chronicles to
be brought to him. As we already know, this book contained also the
record of Mordecai's act. However, this was certainly not the only
record in this book. In contrast, a diary like this, might very well
have hundreds of entries. Nevertheless, in that night there was one
entry absolutely necessary to be read and finally it was this entry that
was read. This entry was no other than the entry regarding Mordecai and
the good that he did to the king, and for which he was not yet honoured!!
After the king heard this record and that Mordecai wasn't yet honoured
guess what happened? He decided to honour Mordecai the next day!! So
when the morning came and Haman arrived to ask the king to hung
Mordecai, an unpleasant surprise was waiting him:
Esther 6:4-9
"So the king said, "who is in the court?" Now
Haman had just entered the outer court of the king's palace to
suggest that the king hung Mordecai on the gallows that he prepared for
him. The king's servants said to him, "Haman is there, standing in
the court." And the king said, "Let him come in." So Haman came in, and the king asked him, "what shall be done for
the man whom the king delights to honour?" NOW HAMAN THOUGHT IN HIS
HEART, "WHOM WOULD THE KING DELIGHT TO HONOUR MORE THAN ME?"
And Haman answered the king, "For the man whom the king
delights to honour, let the royal robe be brought which the king uses to
wear, and the horse on which the king rides, and the crown royal which
is set upon his head. Then let this robe and horse be delivered to the
hand of one of the king's most noble princes, that he may array the man
whom the king delights to honour. Then parade him on horseback through
the street of the city, and proclaim before him: "Thus shall it be
done to the man whom the king delights to honour!"
(NKJV-KJV)
Haman
said all these things, thinking that it was he that the king wanted to honor. BUT....................
Esther 6:10-12
"Then the king said to Haman, "Hurry, take the robe and the
horse, as you have suggested, and do so FOR MORDECAI THE JEW WHO
SITS WITHIN THE KING'S GATE! Leave nothing undone of all that you
have spoken." So Haman took the robe and the horse, arrayed
Mordecai and led him on horseback through the street of the city, and
proclaimed before him, "Thus shall it be done to the man whom the
king delights to honor!" Afterward Mordecai went back to the
king's gate. But Haman hurried to his house, mourning and with his head
covered."
Do
you remember how it started? It started with Mordecai in the king's gate
and MOURNING for the evil that Haman planned against him and his nation.
But see how it ended up: it ended up with Mordecai, the man that trusted
in God, riding the king's horse and wearing the king's robe, and with
Haman, till then second in command, proclaiming before him and returning
to his home "MOURNING"!! However, this is not the end of the
story. There is more that happened during the banquet with the queen.
During this banquet Esther revealed to the king her nationality and that
Haman planned to destroy her whole nation. When the king heard this, he
became very angry (Esther 7:7-8), and when the kings in those days
became angry with someone then, except if he had God in his sight, the
prospects for his life were very unpleasant! This was true for Haman as
well, whose gallows finally was to be used personally!:
Esther 7:9-10
"Now Harbonah, one of the eunuchs, said to the king, "Look!
the gallows, fifty cubits high, which Haman made for Mordecai, who spoke
good on the king's behalf, is standing at the house of Haman. "
THEN THE KING SAID, "HANG HIM [Haman] ON IT!" SO THEY HANGED
HAMAN ON THE GALLOWS THAT HE HAD PREPARED FOR MORDECAI. Then the king's
wrath subsided"
As
it is obvious the roles of Mordecai and Haman were reversed. Haman, the
second in command and the man that planned to destroy the whole Jewish
nation and to hung Mordecai, ended up hanged in the very gallows that he
had prepared for Mordecai!! Moreover, as the last verse of the book of
Esther (Esther 10:3) tells us, Mordecai, the man that trusted in God,
was made "second to king Ahasueres", in other words he was
made second in command, taking the place of Haman!! Finally though the
thirteenth of the twelfth month was defined as the day that the Jews
were to be utterly destroyed, the king not only cancelled this command
but also REVERSED it. Under the new command:
Esther 8:11-12
"the king permitted the Jews who were in every city to gather
together and protect their lives - to destroy, kill and annihilate all
the forces of any people or province that would assault them, both
little children and women, and to plunder their possessions, on one day
in all the provinces of king Ahasueres, on the thirteenth day of the
twelfth month, which is the month of Adar."
Really
what a great delivering God He is. Mordecai the man that trusted in God,
started mourning, and under the threat to be hanged by Haman, but he
ended up, glorified by his very enemy, and taking his position as second
in command. Similarly, the Jews started "weeping and wailing"
(Esther 4:3) and they ended up feasting (Esther 8:17) and with their
enemies destroyed (Esther 9:1)
On the contrary, Haman the man that
trusted in his own power, started as second in command, joyful, and
preparing to hung Mordecai but he ended up, mourning and eventually
hanged in the very gallows that he had prepared for Mordecai!
5. Conclusion
Finishing this brief
study of the book of Esther, we could say that its lesson is the same
lesson that is offered by many other portions of the Word of God i.e.
that the Word of God is a steadfast Word, a Word that cannot be broken
despite the human and devilish power that may be exercised to the
contrary. Indeed, those that, as Mordecai, trust in Him "shall not
be ashamed" (Isaiah 49:23) but they "shall be like a tree
planted by the waters, which spreads out its roots by the river, and
will not fear when heat comes; but its leaf will be green, and will not
be anxious in the year of draught, nor will cease from yielding
fruit" (Jeremiah 17:8). To conclude therefore:
Psalm 37:3-7, 9, 11
"TRUST IN THE LORD, and do good; Dwell in the land and verily you
shall be fed. Delight yourself also in the Lord, and He shall give you
the desires of your heart. Commit your way to the Lord, Trust also in
Him, and he shall bring it to pass. He shall bring forth your
righteousness as the light, and your justice as the noon day. Rest in
the Lord, and wait patiently for Him;........those who wait on the Lord
shall inherit the earth.......the meek shall inherit the earth, and
shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace."
(NKJV-KJV)
Tassos Kioulachoglou
Footnotes
1.
This name was rather a title (like Pharaoh, Char etc.) than a proper
name, and it meant "the venerable king". According to: Sir
Henry Rawlinson, Professor Sayce, The Encyclopaedia Britannica, and The
Century Encyclopaedia of Names (see: The Companion Bible, Kregel
Publications, p. 618) the same also happened with the words "Artaxerxes"
(it means "the great king") and "Darius" (it means
"the maintainer") that appear quite a few times in some parts
of the Scripture that refer to the captivity to Babylon (press
here to return where you stopped).
2.
See Esther 1 for details (press here to return
where you stopped).
3.
See the article: "God: the source of favour" (press
here to return where you stopped).
4.
For more on Agag see I Samuel 15 (press
here to return where you stopped).
5.
Josephus also in his Antiquities, calls him Amalekite (press
here to return where you stopped).
6.
See for example: II Chronicles 16:9, Psalms 18:2-3, 30-31, 22:4-5,
25:2-3, 32:10, 35:9-10, 119:170 etc (press here to
return where you stopped).
7.
This of course does not mean that every time that I cannot sleep
there is a purpose that I should stay awake! (press
here to return where you stopped).
PDF
version (printer friendly)
E-mail
this article